VNX-SEC-079: GitHub fine-grained personal access token
Reports a whole GitHub fine-grained personal access token (github_pat_ with its 22 and 59 character parts) in any file, excluding placeholders, truncated tokens, prefix checks, CI-secret references and test files.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Rule ID | VNX-SEC-079 |
| Severity | Critical |
| SARIF level | error |
| Kind | secrets |
| Languages | Any file |
| CWE | CWE-798 |
| CAPEC | CAPEC-191 |
| ATT&CK | T1552.001 |
| CWSS vector | CWSS:1.0/TI:C/AP:A/AL:A/IC:N/FC:LT/RP:N/RL:A/AV:I/AS:N/IN:A/SC:A/BI:C/DI:H/EX:H/EC:N/P:W |
| Tags | secrets github credentials |
| Source | internal/sast/rules/vnx-sec-079.rego |
Overview
This rule reports a GitHub fine-grained personal access token, github_pat_ followed by 22 alphanumeric characters, an underscore and 59 more, on its own, assigned, in an Authorization header or inside a clone URL. The token is redacted in the finding’s snippet.
Why This Matters
Hardcoded github fine-grained personal access token values are routinely scraped by automated bots within minutes of a public push, and then used to access the account, exfiltrate data, or pivot into downstream services. Once the credential is in git history it is permanently in third-party hands.
What Gets Flagged
// FLAGGED
export const octokit = new Octokit({ auth: "github_pat_<22 characters>_<59 characters>" });
# FLAGGED: token inside a clone URL
git clone https://x-access-token:github_pat_<22>_<59>@github.com/acme/infra.git
Not flagged:
- Classic
ghp_tokens (VNX-SEC-004 reports them). - Prefix checks (
strings.HasPrefix(t, "github_pat_")), truncated tokens and placeholders (github_pat_xxxx...). - CI-secret references (
${{ secrets.RELEASE_PAT }}). - Test, fixture, vendored and generated files.
VNX-SEC-004 also reports these tokens as part of its wider GitHub/GitLab set.
Remediation
- Revoke the leaked credential in the provider’s console immediately.
- Replace with a short-lived alternative, OAuth 2.0 access tokens, IAM role assumption, OIDC federation, wherever the platform supports it.
- Store the new credential in a secrets manager (AWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault, GitHub Actions secrets, Doppler).
- Audit the provider’s access logs for activity you did not initiate between the leak and the revocation.
- Purge from git history with
git filter-repoor BFG, then re-scan with gitleaks/truffleHog to confirm no other secrets remain. - Enable push protection so future commits are blocked at the developer machine.
References
- CWE-798: Use of Hard-coded Credentials
- gitleaks
- truffleHog
- OWASP Credentials Management Cheat Sheet
- MITRE ATT&CK T1552.001 – Credentials In Files
- git-filter-repo
Suppressing this rule
Put a nosec comment on the line, or on line 1 to cover the whole file. Use the comment marker of the file’s language (#, //, -- or ;):
# nosec vnx-sec-079
// nosec vnx-sec-079
Or record an ignore rule: vulnetix ignore add --rule vnx-sec-079 --reason "...". See Suppressing findings.